World: Airlines reject curbside checks floated after Brussels bombs

Airlines are opposed to screening passengers just before they enter an airport, with such steps -- widely proposed after the March 22 bombings in Brussels -- likely to increase waiting times and prove ineffective in preventing attacks, the IATA said. Carriers instead favour the streamlining of security through a risk-based approach and wider adoption of more modern systems including self-service technology that would raise the hurdles facing would-be terrorists, IATA CEO Tony Tyler said Thursday. The trade body takes the view that curbside screening would not only lengthen lines and expose travelers to inclement weather outside the terminal, but also create large crowds that could themselves become the target of attacks. The Brussels Zaventem hub adopted scans for people seeking to enter its buildings after terrorists exploded bombs in the departure hall, killing 11 people and injuring more than 80. Passengers in India must present their ticket and proof of identity on arrival and have their bags screened and sealed. Tyler said states should make full use of "known-traveller" data provided by carriers. Used mainly in the United States, such programs expedite processing of frequent flyers so that security is focused on the most likely transgressors, he said. IATA also backs risk-assessment of passengers by providing governments with advance information on customers, Tyler said. "The current system of airport screening is effective but extremely expensive," the CEO said. "Passengers routinely rate it as the worst aspect of their journey." Rising traveller volumes are another reason for seeking smoother processing, with existing mechanisms unlikely to cope with increases, he said.<br/>