Flyers will pay more for carbon offsets but not tax, study finds
Travellers are willing to pay more for flights if they believe the extra money will be used to tackle carbon emissions, researchers said on Friday. Passengers were more likely to book flights that carried an extra fee if it was labeled as carbon offset than if it was called a carbon tax, researchers at the University of British Columbia found. Offsetting aims to mitigate the climate damage carbon emissions cause by paying to prevent or reduce emissions elsewhere. “Taxes feel like you’re charging people money for nothing,” said David Hardisty, an assistant professor of marketing and behavioral science at UBC Sauder School of Business. “Whereas an offset is the idea that, ‘Sure we’re paying, but we kind of have an idea where that payment is going, to make the environment better,’ which is what people want.” The findings were published this week in the Journal of Environmental Psychology and suggest a possible way for the global airline industry, under pressure over carbon emissions, to improve its record. The study consisted of two separate online surveys of more than 1,800 participants in the United States. The aim was to gauge consumers’ reaction to a $14 carbon fee that was presented to them in several different ways at the time of a hypothetical ticket purchase.<br/>
https://portal.staralliance.com/cms/news/hot-topics/2019-10-07/general/flyers-will-pay-more-for-carbon-offsets-but-not-tax-study-finds
https://portal.staralliance.com/cms/logo.png
Flyers will pay more for carbon offsets but not tax, study finds
Travellers are willing to pay more for flights if they believe the extra money will be used to tackle carbon emissions, researchers said on Friday. Passengers were more likely to book flights that carried an extra fee if it was labeled as carbon offset than if it was called a carbon tax, researchers at the University of British Columbia found. Offsetting aims to mitigate the climate damage carbon emissions cause by paying to prevent or reduce emissions elsewhere. “Taxes feel like you’re charging people money for nothing,” said David Hardisty, an assistant professor of marketing and behavioral science at UBC Sauder School of Business. “Whereas an offset is the idea that, ‘Sure we’re paying, but we kind of have an idea where that payment is going, to make the environment better,’ which is what people want.” The findings were published this week in the Journal of Environmental Psychology and suggest a possible way for the global airline industry, under pressure over carbon emissions, to improve its record. The study consisted of two separate online surveys of more than 1,800 participants in the United States. The aim was to gauge consumers’ reaction to a $14 carbon fee that was presented to them in several different ways at the time of a hypothetical ticket purchase.<br/>