Boeing is under FAA scrutiny over reports that it may hamper oversight
The FAA is looking into Boeing’s corporate culture, which an agency official said “appears to hamper” Boeing employees responsible for providing oversight, raising safety concerns and otherwise representing the agency’s interests. In a letter to the company last week, the official, Ian Won, said that the FAA’s review was based on a recent survey of a few dozen of the 1,400 Boeing employees who work on the agency’s behalf through a program called Organization Designation Authorization. Boeing’s structure appears “to provide a strong influence” over how those employees are appointed, managed and allowed to work, he said, providing “ample opportunity for interference rather than independence.” “These concerns require an objective review and further fact finding,” Won wrote in the letter. The agency’s reliance on company employees to review regulatory compliance has been criticized as allowing the aviation industry to police itself. But defenders say the arrangement is necessary because the FAA lacks the resources for thorough oversight of the sprawling industry. Last week’s letter was based on a survey of 32 employees in May and June. Nearly a dozen workers complained or shared stories that suggested Boeing had made it difficult for them to act with independence, the agency said. According to excerpts from the survey responses, the concerns included finding that management would stall when design issues were raised so that the company could continue delivering planes and feeling that a manager would shop around for approval if an employee didn’t provide it. Boeing said it took the concerns seriously.<br/>
https://portal.staralliance.com/cms/news/hot-topics/2021-08-25/general/boeing-is-under-faa-scrutiny-over-reports-that-it-may-hamper-oversight
https://portal.staralliance.com/cms/logo.png
Boeing is under FAA scrutiny over reports that it may hamper oversight
The FAA is looking into Boeing’s corporate culture, which an agency official said “appears to hamper” Boeing employees responsible for providing oversight, raising safety concerns and otherwise representing the agency’s interests. In a letter to the company last week, the official, Ian Won, said that the FAA’s review was based on a recent survey of a few dozen of the 1,400 Boeing employees who work on the agency’s behalf through a program called Organization Designation Authorization. Boeing’s structure appears “to provide a strong influence” over how those employees are appointed, managed and allowed to work, he said, providing “ample opportunity for interference rather than independence.” “These concerns require an objective review and further fact finding,” Won wrote in the letter. The agency’s reliance on company employees to review regulatory compliance has been criticized as allowing the aviation industry to police itself. But defenders say the arrangement is necessary because the FAA lacks the resources for thorough oversight of the sprawling industry. Last week’s letter was based on a survey of 32 employees in May and June. Nearly a dozen workers complained or shared stories that suggested Boeing had made it difficult for them to act with independence, the agency said. According to excerpts from the survey responses, the concerns included finding that management would stall when design issues were raised so that the company could continue delivering planes and feeling that a manager would shop around for approval if an employee didn’t provide it. Boeing said it took the concerns seriously.<br/>