EASA scrutinises surface micro-texture to reduce runway overruns
Europe’s aviation regulator is initiating a research effort intended to address the risk of overruns caused by deficiencies in runway micro-texture, and explore the use of laser-scanning to establish suitable thresholds for runway surfaces. Analysis of a number of overrun events showed that aircraft brakes and anti-skid functions were normal, the macro-texture depths of the runway was within the correct range, and there was no significant rubber accumulation. “In these occurrences the runways were wet and not flooded,” says the EASA. “It was believed that the difference in the braking performance was due to the deficiencies in the surface’s micro-texture.” Friction-measurement devices are used to compare surface friction measurements against required levels. But in some of the overrun events the devices recorded a friction level above minimum while the aircraft experienced substantially lower levels during the landing. Micro-texture is the fine-scale roughness from the presence of small aggregate particles, and complement the macro-texture to ensure good braking action in the wet. Smooth micro-texture, says EASA, can cause low braking friction even when the runway is damp. “There are neither minimum requirements nor an established method for determining and monitoring micro-texture characteristics,” it states.<br/>
https://portal.staralliance.com/cms/news/hot-topics/2021-10-12/general/easa-scrutinises-surface-micro-texture-to-reduce-runway-overruns
https://portal.staralliance.com/cms/logo.png
EASA scrutinises surface micro-texture to reduce runway overruns
Europe’s aviation regulator is initiating a research effort intended to address the risk of overruns caused by deficiencies in runway micro-texture, and explore the use of laser-scanning to establish suitable thresholds for runway surfaces. Analysis of a number of overrun events showed that aircraft brakes and anti-skid functions were normal, the macro-texture depths of the runway was within the correct range, and there was no significant rubber accumulation. “In these occurrences the runways were wet and not flooded,” says the EASA. “It was believed that the difference in the braking performance was due to the deficiencies in the surface’s micro-texture.” Friction-measurement devices are used to compare surface friction measurements against required levels. But in some of the overrun events the devices recorded a friction level above minimum while the aircraft experienced substantially lower levels during the landing. Micro-texture is the fine-scale roughness from the presence of small aggregate particles, and complement the macro-texture to ensure good braking action in the wet. Smooth micro-texture, says EASA, can cause low braking friction even when the runway is damp. “There are neither minimum requirements nor an established method for determining and monitoring micro-texture characteristics,” it states.<br/>