EASA seeks to tighten engine certification criteria for uncontained debris
Safety regulators in Europe are aiming to tighten engine certification requirements to take into account forward and rearward release of uncontained debris in the event of a powerplant failure. Analysis of fan-blade failures indicates that certification of engines could be improved, says the European Union Aviation Safety Agency, particularly by “better integrating” analysis and identification of potential threats to the aircraft type to which the engine is to be fitted. It cites the case of a Southwest Boeing 737-700 which suffered uncontained failure of its left-hand CFM International CFM56 engine in April 2018. Parts of the engine cowl struck the fuselage and damaged a window, causing rapid depressurisation and fatally injuring a passenger. The accident was traced to a low-cycle fatigue crack in a fan blade, which separated and struck a critical part of the fan case structure. EASA says the potential release of uncontained debris in the forward and rearward directions is “not sufficiently addressed” by certification specifications, and limited only to provisions relating to blade-containment testing. Aircraft manufacturers must be given data from engine tests to ascertain the forces on aircraft structures from out-of-balance engines still running after blade failures. But EASA says that displacements and loads transmitted to the structure of the engine nacelle itself have not been adequately considered during certification of some aircraft and powerplants.<br/>
https://portal.staralliance.com/cms/news/hot-topics/2021-11-23/general/easa-seeks-to-tighten-engine-certification-criteria-for-uncontained-debris
https://portal.staralliance.com/cms/logo.png
EASA seeks to tighten engine certification criteria for uncontained debris
Safety regulators in Europe are aiming to tighten engine certification requirements to take into account forward and rearward release of uncontained debris in the event of a powerplant failure. Analysis of fan-blade failures indicates that certification of engines could be improved, says the European Union Aviation Safety Agency, particularly by “better integrating” analysis and identification of potential threats to the aircraft type to which the engine is to be fitted. It cites the case of a Southwest Boeing 737-700 which suffered uncontained failure of its left-hand CFM International CFM56 engine in April 2018. Parts of the engine cowl struck the fuselage and damaged a window, causing rapid depressurisation and fatally injuring a passenger. The accident was traced to a low-cycle fatigue crack in a fan blade, which separated and struck a critical part of the fan case structure. EASA says the potential release of uncontained debris in the forward and rearward directions is “not sufficiently addressed” by certification specifications, and limited only to provisions relating to blade-containment testing. Aircraft manufacturers must be given data from engine tests to ascertain the forces on aircraft structures from out-of-balance engines still running after blade failures. But EASA says that displacements and loads transmitted to the structure of the engine nacelle itself have not been adequately considered during certification of some aircraft and powerplants.<br/>